The other night I got this from a friend "Doctors say diabetes is inherited,"
"and therefore the patient's descendants are diagnosed with this disease, it will be described as inherited."
So what's actually wrong with these two statements? To be honest with you, nothing is wrong with them. It's how people misinterpreted them, that is the mistake. The fact that somebody made a statement doesn't make it true or false. It only serves as a strong support or indication.
To be clear, if a mother has diabetes and his son has diabetes as well, it's not correct to conclude that his diabetes is inherited.
It could probably be other factors contributing to it. See what I mean?
Conclusion:
There's a high correlation between the statements but there's no definite relationship between the speaker and the things being spoken.
Another thought...
Let's compare for example,
"Frost Mint thinks the universe is endless."
"Loland Radzinski ( a theoritical physicist and cosmologist) thinks the universe is endless."
Interpretation:
Since they think(suggesting an opinion), the opinion is entirely independent of whether the universe is endless or not.
They could be right that the universe has no boundary but that wouldn’t have anything to do with their belief.
There are two conclusions:
1.The validity of the statement doesn't depend on who gave it, however it serves as a strong indication of that matter.
2.Never just believe anything what people said and what you see.( At the very least, try to analyse and think if it's logical, sensible or possible ).
Try to spot what I'm saying here =P
Never believe what you don't want to believe, because in that way you have one less thing to think about, considering how much brain juice you have to use.
TacTics
No comments:
Post a Comment